Cuando una pareja se separa, la ley dice cómo deben dividir lo que han comprado juntos. Si alguien trata de engañar al otro con la propiedad, eso puede afectar lo que le corresponde.
Es como cuando dos amigos deciden juntar su dinero para comprar una bicicleta. Si uno de ellos intenta venderla sin avisar al otro, eso no es justo y puede traer problemas.
Imagina que Juan y María compran una casa durante su matrimonio. Si Juan decide darle la casa solo a María sin su consentimiento, María podría reclamar su parte porque ambos trabajaron para conseguirla. Después de la separación, un juez podría decidir que ambos tienen derecho a la casa.
d to wife, the trial court did not err by denying the wife's motion for directed verdict, by charging the jury that gifts, for purposes of determining the parties' separate property, consist of gifts from a nonspouse before or during the marriage, nor by entering judgment on the jury's verdict awarding to the husband a 35 percent interest in the house. McArthur v. McArthur, 256 Ga. 762 , 353 S.E.2d 486 (1987). Former husband was barred from seeking resulting trust in parties' residence, because his misconduct of fraudulently transferring the house to the former wife related directly to the transaction from which he sought relief - the transfer of the house placing title in her, but his misconduct in transferring the residence did not relate directly to his claim for an equitable division of the residence. That claim was based not on the circumstances surrounding the transfer, but on the fact that the property was acquired during the parties' marriage, through their labor and investments, thereby giving each party an equitable interest therein. Sparks v. Sparks, 256 Ga. 788 , 353 S.E.2d 508 (1987). Effect of conveyance of separate property. - Husband deeding of a home to both his wife and himself, to be held as "tenants in common" with right of survivorship manifested an intent to transform the husband's own separate property into marital property; because both the husband and the wife then owned an undivided one-half interest in the property, the entire home should have been
El cónyuge que recibe la propiedad puede tener problemas si la transferencia se considera fraudulenta, especialmente si se hizo para evitar compartirla con el otro cónyuge.
Los bienes se dividen tomando en cuenta si fueron adquiridos durante el matrimonio y cómo fueron financiados, lo que puede dar a cada parte un interés equitativo.
Los regalos entre cónyuges generalmente no se consideran parte de la propiedad separada, ya que se asume que son para ambos, pero los regalos de terceros se tratan de manera diferente.
¿Necesita ayuda para analizar su caso?
Seguir Investigando →