Procedimientos de Extradición en Georgia

Explicación Simple

Si alguien es arrestado en un estado y otro estado quiere que vuelva por un delito, necesita un permiso especial. Este permiso debe ser revisado para asegurarse de que todo esté en orden antes de que la persona sea llevada de regreso.

Es como cuando un profesor necesita un permiso para llevar a un estudiante a una excursión. Si el permiso no está bien, el estudiante no puede ir.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que Juan vive en Georgia pero es buscado por la policía de Florida por un delito. La policía de Georgia necesita asegurarse de que los documentos que piden su extradición estén correctos antes de llevar a Juan de vuelta a Florida.

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

s committed, the affadavit is insufficient to sustain an extradition warrant. Brown v. Grimes, 214 Ga. 388 , 104 S.E.2d 907 (1958). Sufficiency of supporting documents always open to judicial inquiry. - Question as to whether or not the extradition warrant under which an alleged fugitive from justice is held is supported by documents from the demanding state legally sufficient to authorize the fugitive's extradition is always open to judicial inquiry in a habeas corpus proceeding. Brown v. Grimes, 214 Ga. 388 , 104 S.E.2d 907 (1958). Burden of showing why warrant should not be executed. - When, in the trial of a habeas corpus case, it appears that the respondent is holding the petitioner in custody under an executive warrant based upon an extradition proceeding, and the warrant is regular on the warrant's face, the burden is cast upon the petitioner to show some valid and sufficient reason why the warrant should not be executed since there is a presumption that the Governor complied with the Constitution and law and this presumption continues until the contrary appears. Baldwin v. Grimes, 216 Ga. 390 , 116 S.E.2d 207 (1960). If the warrant is regular on the warrant's face, the burden is cast upon the petitioner to show some valid and sufficient reason why the warrant should not be executed. The presumption is that the Governor has complied with the Constitution and the law, and this presumption continues until the contrary appears. Wollweber v. Martin, 226 Ga.