Recursos legales tras una condena por DUI en Colorado

Explicación Simple

Si alguien recibe una condena por manejar borracho, tiene seis meses para tratar de cambiar esa decisión. Después de ese tiempo, solo puede hacerlo en situaciones muy específicas.

Es como si tuvieras una receta de cocina que seguiste mal. Tienes un tiempo limitado para corregirla antes de que se sirva la comida. Después, solo puedes volver a la cocina si hay una buena razón.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que Juan fue condenado por DUI y se le dio un juicio. Pasaron seis meses y no pidió cambiar la sentencia. Ahora, si quiere intentar impugnarla, solo podrá hacerlo si demuestra que el juez no tenía autoridad para juzgarlo o si tenía problemas de salud mental que le impidieron actuar a tiempo.

Penalidades

null

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

C.R.S. 42-4-1702 – Alcohol- or drug-related traffic offenses (1) No person against whom a judgment has been entered for DUI, DUI per se, DWAI, or UDD shall collaterally attack the validity of that judgment unless such attack is commenced within six months after the date of entry of the judgment. (2) In recognition of the difficulties attending the litigation of stale claims and the potential for frustrating various statutory provisions directed at repeat offenders, former offenders, and habitual offenders, the only exceptions to the time limitations specified in subsection (1)(a) of this section are: (a) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the alleged infraction; (b) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the person of the violator; (c) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was caused by an adjudication of incompetence or by commitment or certification of the violator to an institution for treatment as a person with a mental health disorder; or (d) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was the result of circumstances amounting to justifiable excuse or excusable neglect.