Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ziegler v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Ziegler)
No. 8626667 · Decided December 8, 2006
No. 8626667·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 8, 2006
Citation
No. 8626667
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Wayne T. Ziegler appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) and we affirm. *618 The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ziegler’s second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case because the claims he seeks to add to his asset list are without merit. All of Ziegler’s proposed claims are ones that he purposely failed to disclose on the schedule of assets he filed in connection with his 1986 Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. We held in Ziegler’s previous appeal that he is estopped from “litigating causes of actions concealed from his creditors and the bankruptcy trustee.” Ziegler v. Bank of America, 99 Fed.Appx. 819, 820 (9th Cir.2004). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Ziegler appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case.
Key Points
01Ziegler appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case.
02*618 The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ziegler’s second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case because the claims he seeks to add to his asset list are without merit.
03All of Ziegler’s proposed claims are ones that he purposely failed to disclose on the schedule of assets he filed in connection with his 1986 Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition.
04We held in Ziegler’s previous appeal that he is estopped from “litigating causes of actions concealed from his creditors and the bankruptcy trustee.” Ziegler v.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ziegler appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his second motion to reopen his 1986 bankruptcy case.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ziegler v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Ziegler) in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 8, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626667 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.