Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641286
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Zargaryan v. Gonzales
No. 8641286 · Decided June 7, 2000
No. 8641286·Ninth Circuit · 2000·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 7, 2000
Citation
No. 8641286
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Nakshun Zargaryan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, and her minor daughter, Marine Vartsumyan, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying their motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based upon changed country conditions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review. The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Zargaryan’s motion to reopen because it was filed nearly one year after the BIA’s final removal order, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final administrative removal order), and Zargaryan failed to present new and material evidence of changed conditions in Armenia, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (no time limit on motion to reopen to apply for asylum based on changed country conditions). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Nakshun Zargaryan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, and her minor daughter, Marine Vartsumyan, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decisi
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Nakshun Zargaryan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, and her minor daughter, Marine Vartsumyan, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decisi
02INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Zargaryan’s motion to reopen because it was filed nearly one year after the BIA’s final removal order, see 8 U.S.C.
04§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final administrative removal order), and Zargaryan failed to present new and material evidence of changed conditions in Armenia, see 8 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Nakshun Zargaryan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, and her minor daughter, Marine Vartsumyan, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decisi
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Zargaryan v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 7, 2000.
Use the citation No. 8641286 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.