Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Zarco v. Golding
No. 8630565 · Decided April 24, 2007
No. 8630565·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 24, 2007
Citation
No. 8630565
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Juan Daniel Zarco appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to excessive force, denying him medical care, interfering with his access to courts, and denying him due process in disciplinary proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Rivera v. United States, 924 F.2d 948, 950 (9th Cir.1991) (dismissal for failure to state a claim), Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissals under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (summary judgment). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Juan Daniel Zarco appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Juan Daniel Zarco appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging defendants violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to excessive force, denying him medical care, interfering with his access to courts, and denying him due process in disciplinary proceedings.
03United States, 924 F.2d 948, 950 (9th Cir.1991) (dismissal for failure to state a claim), Resnick v.
04Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissals under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act); Lopez v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Juan Daniel Zarco appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Zarco v. Golding in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 24, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630565 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.