FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630080
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Zahavi v. Wells Dairy, Inc.

No. 8630080 · Decided April 13, 2007
No. 8630080 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 13, 2007
Citation
No. 8630080
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Harel Zahavi d/b/a Goldi Ice Cream appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment in favor of Wells Dairy, Inc. in Zahavi’s action for breach of contract. The remaining claims were voluntarily dismissed, so we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing de novo, Geurin v. Winston Indus., Inc., 316 F.3d 879, 882 (9th Cir.2002), we affirm the decision of the district court. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we need not recount it here. Section 2 in each of the parties’ Master Vendor Agreements provides that upon expiration of the agreements’ initial three-year duration period, the agreements will renew automatically unless one of the parties gives written notice of its intention to terminate at least thirty days prior to the end of the term. Because Wells provided notices of termination in accordance with section 2, we conclude that Wells’s terminations did not breach the parties’ agreements. We reject Zahavi’s argument that evidence of the parties’ course of dealing is admissible to demonstrate that the agreements could be terminated only for cause. Under Iowa law, which governs the agreements, a fully integrated contract may not be contradicted by evidence of a prior or contemporaneous agreement. Iowa Code § 554.2202 . The Master Vendor Agreements, which are fully integrated contracts, 1 require only that the parties provide written notice if they intend to terminate the agreements upon expiration of the initial three-year duration period. Any evidence' of the parties’ course of dealing that would impose a for-cause termination requirement at the end of the initial term contradicts the parties’ express agreement and, therefore, is inadmissible. See id. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . The agreements “constitute[] the entire agreement between the parties and will not be amended, except by written instrument signed by both parties.”
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Harel Zahavi d/b/a Goldi Ice Cream appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment in favor of Wells Dairy, Inc.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Harel Zahavi d/b/a Goldi Ice Cream appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment in favor of Wells Dairy, Inc.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Zahavi v. Wells Dairy, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 13, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630080 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →