Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Young v. Washington
No. 8645528 · Decided November 19, 2007
No. 8645528·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 19, 2007
Citation
No. 8645528
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant’s motion received September 7, 2007 is construed as a motion to reinstate this appeal, which was dismissed by the Clerk on July 13, 2007 for failure to pay the filing fees in compliance with the June 13, 2007 order denying in forma pauperis status. Appellant has paid the docketing and filing fees so the motion to reinstate the appeal is granted. The mandate is recalled and the appeal is reinstated. Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant’s motion received September 7, 2007 is construed as a motion to reinstate this appeal, which was dismissed by the Clerk on July 13, 2007 for failure to pay the filing fees in compliance with the June 13, 2007 order d
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Appellant’s motion received September 7, 2007 is construed as a motion to reinstate this appeal, which was dismissed by the Clerk on July 13, 2007 for failure to pay the filing fees in compliance with the June 13, 2007 order d
02Appellant has paid the docketing and filing fees so the motion to reinstate the appeal is granted.
03Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief.
04Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant’s motion received September 7, 2007 is construed as a motion to reinstate this appeal, which was dismissed by the Clerk on July 13, 2007 for failure to pay the filing fees in compliance with the June 13, 2007 order d
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Young v. Washington in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 19, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645528 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.