Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8779018
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Yellow Aster Min. & Mill. Co. v. Crane Co.
No. 8779018 · Decided February 11, 1907
No. 8779018·Ninth Circuit · 1907·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 11, 1907
Citation
No. 8779018
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ROSS, Circuit Judge. This action was originally brought in one of the superior courts of the state of California by the defendant in error to recover for goods, wares, and merchandise by it sold and delivered to the plaintiff in error. The defendant in error being a corporation of the state of Illinois, and therefore a citizen of that state, and the plaintiff in error being a corporation of the state of Nevada, and therefore a citizen of that state, the latter moved the state court for the transfer of the action, because of such diverse citizenship of the parties, to the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of California, and, upon the filing of the petition and a bond, the case was so removed and tried in the court below, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in-the action, from which court the case was brought here for review by writ of error. Neither party to the action being at the time of its commencement a citizen or resident of the state of California, we must, without reference to the merits of the controversy, upon the authority of the case of Ex parte Abram C. Wisner, 87 Sup. Ct. 150, 51 L. Ed. -, decided by the Supreme Court December 10, 1906 (Advance Sheets), reverse *581 the judgment, with costs to the defendant in error, and with directions - to the court below to remand th.e case to the state court from which it came, for lack of jurisdiction of the federal court over it. Ordered accordingly.
Plain English Summary
This action was originally brought in one of the superior courts of the state of California by the defendant in error to recover for goods, wares, and merchandise by it sold and delivered to the plaintiff in error.
Key Points
01This action was originally brought in one of the superior courts of the state of California by the defendant in error to recover for goods, wares, and merchandise by it sold and delivered to the plaintiff in error.
02The defendant in error being a corporation of the state of Illinois, and therefore a citizen of that state, and the plaintiff in error being a corporation of the state of Nevada, and therefore a citizen of that state, the latter moved the s
03Neither party to the action being at the time of its commencement a citizen or resident of the state of California, we must, without reference to the merits of the controversy, upon the authority of the case of Ex parte Abram C.
04, decided by the Supreme Court December 10, 1906 (Advance Sheets), reverse *581 the judgment, with costs to the defendant in error, and with directions - to the court below to remand th.e case to the state court from which it came, for lack
Frequently Asked Questions
This action was originally brought in one of the superior courts of the state of California by the defendant in error to recover for goods, wares, and merchandise by it sold and delivered to the plaintiff in error.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Yellow Aster Min. & Mill. Co. v. Crane Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 11, 1907.
Use the citation No. 8779018 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.