Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644194
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Xin-Bao He v. Keisler
No. 8644194 · Decided September 28, 2007
No. 8644194·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 28, 2007
Citation
No. 8644194
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Xin-Bao He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Where, as here, the BIA reviews the IJ’s decision de novo, our review is limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent that the IJ’s opinion is expressly adopted. See Shah v. INS, 220 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir.2000). We review for substantial evidence, Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of relief because He submitted numerous fraudulent documents that went to the heart of his claim, and the totality of the record supported an adverse credibility finding. See id. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Xin-Bao He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Xin-Bao He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
02Where, as here, the BIA reviews the IJ’s decision de novo, our review is limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent that the IJ’s opinion is expressly adopted.
03Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition.
04Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of relief because He submitted numerous fraudulent documents that went to the heart of his claim, and the totality of the record supported an adverse credibility finding.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Xin-Bao He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Xin-Bao He v. Keisler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 28, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644194 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.