Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8700194
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Woods v. Adams
No. 8700194 · Decided October 6, 2017
No. 8700194·Ninth Circuit · 2017·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 6, 2017
Citation
No. 8700194
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** 1. The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). This case is unlike Williams v. Paramo, wheré the prisoner alleged actual threats of violence. See 775 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2015). 2. We grant Woods’s first three motions for judicial notice and deny his fourth motion for judicial notice. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C.
02Paramo, wheré the prisoner alleged actual threats of violence.
03We grant Woods’s first three motions for judicial notice and deny his fourth motion for judicial notice.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Woods v. Adams in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 6, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8700194 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.