Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Williams v. Morales
No. 8621659 · Decided May 19, 2006
No. 8621659·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8621659
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs when he was forced to relocate to a top tier cell despite having a medical chrono limiting him to the lower tier. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment for the defendants because Williams did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials acted with deliberate indifference, when his medical chrono did not restrict him from climbing stairs and he was observed on several occasions climbing the stairs to visit inmates on the upper tier. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 105 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Eric Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs when he was forced to relocate to a top tier cell despite having a medical chrono limiting him to the lower tier.
03We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, Morrison v.
04The district court properly granted summary judgment for the defendants because Williams did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials acted with deliberate indifference, when his medical chrono did not restr
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Williams v. Morales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621659 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.