Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/William Edward Dix v. The County of Shasta Shasta County District Attorney's Office Stephen S. Carlton, Individually and as District Attorney for the County of Shasta Shasta County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Phil Eoff, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Shasta County Detective Larry Jarrett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Shasta the County of Humboldt Humboldt County District Attorney's Office Terry R. Farmer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the District Attorney for Humboldt County Kate Green, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Director of the Humboldt County Victim Witness Program Alan Dale Bradley
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 583456
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
William Edward Dix v. The County of Shasta Shasta County District Attorney's Office Stephen S. Carlton, Individually and as District Attorney for the County of Shasta Shasta County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Phil Eoff, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Shasta County Detective Larry Jarrett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Shasta the County of Humboldt Humboldt County District Attorney's Office Terry R. Farmer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the District Attorney for Humboldt County Kate Green, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Director of the Humboldt County Victim Witness Program Alan Dale Bradley
No. 583456 · Decided June 18, 1992
No. 583456·Ninth Circuit · 1992·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 18, 1992
Citation
No. 583456
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
William Edward Dix v. The County of Shasta Shasta County District Attorney's Office Stephen S. Carlton, Individually and as District Attorney for the County of Shasta Shasta County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Phil Eoff, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Shasta County Detective Larry Jarrett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Shasta the County of Humboldt Humboldt County District Attorney's Office Terry R. Farmer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the District Attorney for Humboldt County Kate Green, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Director of the Humboldt County Victim Witness Program Alan Dale Bradley is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for William Edward Dix v. The County of Shasta Shasta County District Attorney's Office Stephen S. Carlton, Individually and as District Attorney for the County of Shasta Shasta County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Phil Eoff, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Shasta County Detective Larry Jarrett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Shasta the County of Humboldt Humboldt County District Attorney's Office Terry R. Farmer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the District Attorney for Humboldt County Kate Green, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Director of the Humboldt County Victim Witness Program Alan Dale Bradley in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 18, 1992.
Use the citation No. 583456 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.