Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621259
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Wheaton v. Schroder
No. 8621259 · Decided May 18, 2006
No. 8621259·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 18, 2006
Citation
No. 8621259
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Bruce R. Wheaton appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with court orders and procedural rules, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Wheaton’s action on the ground that he repeatedly failed to comply with court orders and the rules of procedure requiring him to serve defendants in Germany with a summons translated into the German language. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b) (allowing dismissal of an action for failure of the plaintiff to comply with procedural rules or any order of the court); see also Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (affirming dismissal where plaintiff failed to comply with district court’s order to file an amended complaint). Wheaton’s remaining contentions lack merit. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Wheaton appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action.
Key Points
01Wheaton appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action.
02We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with court orders and procedural rules, Ferdik v.
03The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Wheaton’s action on the ground that he repeatedly failed to comply with court orders and the rules of procedure requiring him to serve defendants in Germany with a summons transl
0441(b) (allowing dismissal of an action for failure of the plaintiff to comply with procedural rules or any order of the court); see also Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (affirming dismissal where plaintiff failed to comply with district court’s
Frequently Asked Questions
Wheaton appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Wheaton v. Schroder in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 18, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621259 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.