FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10304133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Webber v. Colvin

No. 10304133 · Decided December 24, 2024
No. 10304133 · Ninth Circuit · 2024 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 24, 2024
Citation
No. 10304133
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM WEBBER, No. 23-3672 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:21-cv-05101-LRS v. MEMORANDUM** CAROLYN W. COLVIN,* Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 6, 2024 Seattle, Washington Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges. Claimant William Webber filed two applications for disability benefits. In response to the first application, Webber was found non-disabled through May 17, * Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted as Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c). ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 2017. In response to the second application, Webber was found non-disabled through December 31, 2017. Webber appealed from the second decision. The Appeals Council denied a request for review. The district court affirmed the denial of benefits. We affirm the district court. We review the district court’s decision in a social security disability benefits case de novo. Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 574 F.3d 685, 690 (9th Cir. 2009). We “independently determine whether the Commissioner’s decision (1) is free of legal error and (2) is supported by substantial evidence.” Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1279 (9th Cir. 1996). The ALJ did not err in applying the Chavez presumption. For a claimant to “overcome the presumption of continuing nondisability arising from the first administrative law judge’s findings of nondisability,” the claimant “must prove ‘changed circumstances’ indicating a greater disability.” Chavez v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 691, 693 (9th Cir. 1988). If the presumption is rebutted, the ALJ must adopt specific findings from the previous decision unless there is new and material evidence relating to such a finding or a change in law. See id. at 693-94; see also AR 97-4(9). Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s conclusion that the new evidence in the record does not support an award of benefits. The ALJ provided “specific, clear, and convincing reasons” to reject Webber’s subjective statements, pointing to several inconsistencies in the record 2 23-3672 that contradicted his statements. Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1281). The ALJ did not err in evaluating Webber’s medical evidence. The ALJ found Dr. Reuben Grothaus’ diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis unpersuasive because “the claimant does not have sufficient objective findings for this condition.” Substantial evidence supports this determination. Webber’s prior disability determination contained objective evidence supporting the conclusion that Webber did not have ankylosing spondylitis, and Webber did not offer objective medical evidence that would alter that conclusion. The ALJ found Timothy Salvos’ opinion unpersuasive because it relied on Dr. Grothaus’ diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Further, Salvos’ opinion was based on evidence “well after the relevant period.” The ALJ did not err in not addressing the treatment notes of Si Feng. Feng’s notes are not a medical opinion. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1513(a)(1)-(3). Moreover, Feng’s notes nowhere “indicate that [Webber] is incapable of working except under the recommended conditions.” Valentine, 574 F.3d at 691. The ALJ’s assessment of Mark Johnson’s examination is both internally consistent and supported by substantial evidence. Webber received surgery to help treat his neurogenic claudication symptoms after being examined by Johnson. The ALJ concluded that this surgery improved, or eliminated, Webber’s allegedly 3 23-3672 severe neurogenic claudication. Webber also reported to his provider that the surgery improved his symptoms, but he began to suffer more pain after a vehicle collision. AFFIRMED. 4 23-3672
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Webber v. Colvin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 24, 2024.
Use the citation No. 10304133 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →