Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641513
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Keefe
No. 8641513 · Decided June 11, 2007
No. 8641513·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8641513
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** John M. Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the *511 Washington State Bar Association. We dismiss the appeal. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order because that order was based on its determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c), that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (d); United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004); see also Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (per cu-riam) (prohibition on the review of remand orders extends to the district court’s own ability to entertain a motion for reconsideration). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *511 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the *511 Washington State Bar Association.
Key Points
01Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the *511 Washington State Bar Association.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order because that order was based on its determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
03Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004); see also Seedman v.
04of California, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (per cu-riam) (prohibition on the review of remand orders extends to the district court’s own ability to entertain a motion for reconsideration).
Frequently Asked Questions
Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the *511 Washington State Bar Association.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Keefe in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641513 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.