Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Vyas v. Gonzales
No. 8642623 · Decided June 7, 2007
No. 8642623·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 7, 2007
Citation
No. 8642623
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Suresh M. Vyas, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based on changed country conditions. We' have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for an abuse of discretion. See Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we grant the petition for review. The BIA abused its discretion in denying Vyas’ motion to reopen where he provided sufficient evidence that circumstances have changed in India such that he now has a “reasonable likelihood” of demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution. See Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 947-48 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that circumstances had changed where petitioner submitted new evidence of violence against Egytian Coptic Christians generally and specific acts of violence against his family in particular). *319 Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand to the BIA with instructions to reopen. See id. at 948 . PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cír. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Vyas, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based on changed country conditions.
Key Points
01Vyas, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based on changed country conditions.
02Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we grant the petition for review.
03The BIA abused its discretion in denying Vyas’ motion to reopen where he provided sufficient evidence that circumstances have changed in India such that he now has a “reasonable likelihood” of demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecutio
04Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 947-48 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that circumstances had changed where petitioner submitted new evidence of violence against Egytian Coptic Christians generally and specific acts of violence against his family in par
Frequently Asked Questions
Vyas, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based on changed country conditions.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Vyas v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 7, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642623 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.