Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697984
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Vitolo v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
No. 8697984 · Decided October 24, 2016
No. 8697984·Ninth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 24, 2016
Citation
No. 8697984
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 , 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289 , 327 P.3d 129 (2014), the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir. 2015), and the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Perez v. U-Haul Co. of California, 3 Cal. App.5th 408, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 605 (2016). VACATED AND REMANDED. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v.
02CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 , 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289 , 327 P.3d 129 (2014), the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Sakkab v.
03Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir.
042015), and the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Perez v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Vitolo v. Bloomingdale's, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 24, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697984 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.