Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8643011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Villalpando v. Gonzales
No. 8643011 · Decided August 24, 2007
No. 8643011·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 24, 2007
Citation
No. 8643011
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. *385 We have reviewed the record and respondent’s motion for summary disposition. The BIA correctly concluded that, as a matter of law, petitioner is ineligible for cancellation of removal because he failed to demonstrate the requisite ten years continuous physical presence. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised in this petition are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 698 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
02*385 We have reviewed the record and respondent’s motion for summary disposition.
03The BIA correctly concluded that, as a matter of law, petitioner is ineligible for cancellation of removal because he failed to demonstrate the requisite ten years continuous physical presence.
04Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised in this petition are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Villalpando v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 24, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8643011 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.