Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Velasquez-Olandes v. Gonzales
No. 8623633 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623633·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623633
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*445 MEMORANDUM ** Joel Velasquez-Olandes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. Velasquez-Olandes’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by making erroneous and unsupported findings of fact and by misapplying relevant case law does not state a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that “misapplication of case law” may not be reviewed). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*445 MEMORANDUM ** Joel Velasquez-Olandes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellati
Key Points
01*445 MEMORANDUM ** Joel Velasquez-Olandes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellati
02Velasquez-Olandes’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by making erroneous and unsupported findings of fact and by misapplying relevant case law does not state a colorable due process claim.
032005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); Sanchez-Cruz v.
04INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that “misapplication of case law” may not be reviewed).
Frequently Asked Questions
*445 MEMORANDUM ** Joel Velasquez-Olandes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellati
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Velasquez-Olandes v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623633 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.