Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647789
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Vazquez-Zamora v. Mukasey
No. 8647789 · Decided February 20, 2008
No. 8647789·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 20, 2008
Citation
No. 8647789
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The IJ correctly determined that Francisco Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of an aggravated felony and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review his claim that he is eligible for discretionary cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). The record reflects that Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon and with force likely to cause great bodily harm contrary to California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) following his nolo contendere plea. The criminal complaint alleged that he “did willfully and unlawfully commit an assault [ ], with a deadly weapon, to wit, hands, fists, and by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury.” As a result of his plea, Vazquez-Zamora received a sentencing enhancement for the “infliction of great bodily injury.” See CaLPenal Code § 12022.7(a). Because we have held that assault with a deadly weapon is a crime of violence, see Ocampo-Duran v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 1133, 1134-35 (9th Cir.2001), and the sentencing enhancement applies only to principals, not those who aid and abet, see CalJPenal Code § 12022.7(a), Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of an aggravated felony. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The IJ correctly determined that Francisco Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of an aggravated felony and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review his claim that he is eligible for discretionary cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The IJ correctly determined that Francisco Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of an aggravated felony and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review his claim that he is eligible for discretionary cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C
02The record reflects that Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon and with force likely to cause great bodily harm contrary to California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) following his nolo contendere plea.
03The criminal complaint alleged that he “did willfully and unlawfully commit an assault [ ], with a deadly weapon, to wit, hands, fists, and by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury.” As a result of his plea, Vazquez-Zamora re
04Because we have held that assault with a deadly weapon is a crime of violence, see Ocampo-Duran v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The IJ correctly determined that Francisco Vazquez-Zamora was convicted of an aggravated felony and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review his claim that he is eligible for discretionary cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Vazquez-Zamora v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 20, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647789 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.