FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 599205
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Util. L. Rep. P 13,926 City of Santa Clara, Cities of Palo Alto, Redding, Roseville, Biggs, and Gridley Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative and Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. James D. Watkins, Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration and William Clagett, Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, Arvin-Edison Water Storage District Banta-Carbona Irrigation District Byron-Bethany Irrigation District Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District James Irrigation District San Luis Obispo Water District West Side Irrigation District West Stanislaus Irrigation District Trinity County Public Utilities District Hayfork Valley Public Utility District Calaveras Public Power Agency Tuolumne County Public Power Agency Bureau of Electricity of the City of Alameda and the Cities of Lodi, Lompoc, Ukiah and Healdsburg, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants

No. 599205 · Decided January 28, 1993
No. 599205 · Ninth Circuit · 1993 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 28, 1993
Citation
No. 599205
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Util. L. Rep. P 13,926 City of Santa Clara, Cities of Palo Alto, Redding, Roseville, Biggs, and Gridley Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative and Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. James D. Watkins, Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration and William Clagett, Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, Arvin-Edison Water Storage District Banta-Carbona Irrigation District Byron-Bethany Irrigation District Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District James Irrigation District San Luis Obispo Water District West Side Irrigation District West Stanislaus Irrigation District Trinity County Public Utilities District Hayfork Valley Public Utility District Calaveras Public Power Agency Tuolumne County Public Power Agency Bureau of Electricity of the City of Alameda and the Cities of Lodi, Lompoc, Ukiah and Healdsburg, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Util. L. Rep. P 13,926 City of Santa Clara, Cities of Palo Alto, Redding, Roseville, Biggs, and Gridley Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative and Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. James D. Watkins, Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration and William Clagett, Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, Arvin-Edison Water Storage District Banta-Carbona Irrigation District Byron-Bethany Irrigation District Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District James Irrigation District San Luis Obispo Water District West Side Irrigation District West Stanislaus Irrigation District Trinity County Public Utilities District Hayfork Valley Public Utility District Calaveras Public Power Agency Tuolumne County Public Power Agency Bureau of Electricity of the City of Alameda and the Cities of Lodi, Lompoc, Ukiah and Healdsburg, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 28, 1993.
Use the citation No. 599205 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →