FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627146
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Zepeda-Martinez

No. 8627146 · Decided December 13, 2006
No. 8627146 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 13, 2006
Citation
No. 8627146
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Felipe Zepeda-Martinez (“Zepeda”) appeals the district court’s sentence of 70 months following his guilty plea to one count of unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here. Zepeda first argues that the district court improperly enhanced his sentence by sixteen levels. The district court based this funding upon his prior California conviction for corporal injury to a spouse under California Penal Code § 273.5. Under California law, a defendant cannot be convicted under § 273.5 unless “the injury results from a direct application of force on the victim by the defendant.” People v. Jackson, 77 Cal.App.4th 574, 578 , 91 Cal. Rptr.2d 805 (2000). The Jackson court expressly held that the statutory language prevents a conviction merely for the “direct, natural and probable consequences” of an action. Id. at 580 , 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 805 . Thus, Zepeda could not have been convicted based on an aiding and abetting theory and must have himself used force on this victim. This is a crime of violence. Zepeda’s arguments to the contrary are without merit. We also reject Zepeda’s argument that the court improperly relied upon his 2004 reinstatement to support his sentence enhancement. In United States v. Luna-Madellaga, 315 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2003), this court determined that the language of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 “plainly turns on the alien’s physical removal — not the order of removal.” Id. at 1226 . Under Luna, the district court’s reliance on the 2004 reinstatement was proper. Zepeda also challenges his sentence enhancement under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We have addressed that issue in a separate, published opinion filed on this date. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Felipe Zepeda-Martinez (“Zepeda”) appeals the district court’s sentence of 70 months following his guilty plea to one count of unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Felipe Zepeda-Martinez (“Zepeda”) appeals the district court’s sentence of 70 months following his guilty plea to one count of unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Zepeda-Martinez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 13, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627146 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →