Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689492
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Yi Xu Chen
No. 8689492 · Decided September 24, 2008
No. 8689492·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 24, 2008
Citation
No. 8689492
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Yi Xu Chen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(2)(B)(ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Chen contends that the district court erred by permitting the Government to move for a substantial assistance departure as to only Count 4. We conclude that the district court did not plainly err. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (e); cf. Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 185-87 , 112 S.Ct. 1840 , 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992). Chen also contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to consider the Sentencing Guidelines and the other factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). Because Chen did not object at sentencing, plain error review applies. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761-62 (9th Cir.2008). We conclude that no relief is warranted because Chen has not shown that any error affected his substantial rights. See Dallman, 533 F.3d at 761-62 . AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Yi Xu Chen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Yi Xu Chen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Chen contends that the district court erred by permitting the Government to move for a substantial assistance departure as to only Count 4.
03Chen also contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to consider the Sentencing Guidelines and the other factors contained in 18 U.S.C.
04Because Chen did not object at sentencing, plain error review applies.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Yi Xu Chen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Yi Xu Chen in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 24, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689492 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.