Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8443610
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Yepiz
No. 8443610 · Decided November 20, 2017
No. 8443610·Ninth Circuit · 2017·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 20, 2017
Citation
No. 8443610
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2016), are withdrawn. The opinion may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A concurrently issued amended memorandum disposition ' addresses all of the issues before the court. Pursuant to the court’s May 31, 2017 order (No. 07-50051, Docket Entry No. 352), the following motions, submitted pro se by appellant Jose Luis Mejia, will not be considered: his April 10 and May 22, 2017 motions to join in other appellants’ petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc (No. 07-50051, Docket Entry Nos. 333, 348); his April 24, 2017 motion for leave to supplement his petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (No. 07-50051, Docket Entry No. 345), his May 24, 2017 motion to terminate hearing with the Appellate Commissioner (No. 07-50051; Docket Entry No. 350), and his June 30, 2017 motion'for reconsideration (No. 07-50051, Docket Entry No. 353). The panel has voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing and to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied.
Plain English Summary
ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir.
Key Points
01ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir.
02The opinion may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
03A concurrently issued amended memorandum disposition ' addresses all of the issues before the court.
04352), the following motions, submitted pro se by appellant Jose Luis Mejia, will not be considered: his April 10 and May 22, 2017 motions to join in other appellants’ petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc (No.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Yepiz in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 20, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8443610 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.