Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622219
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Yarbrough
No. 8622219 · Decided June 19, 2006
No. 8622219·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8622219
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Curtis Yarbrough appeals from the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release after a guilty-plea conviction for three counts of bank robbery *682 and two counts of attempted bank robbery, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Yarbrough contends that the district comet’s imposition of a condition of supervised release that requires him to pay all or part of the costs of his drug and psychiatric treatment is an improper delegation of the court’s exclusive authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3672 to the probation officer. This contention is foreclosed by our holding in United States v. Dupas, 419 F.3d 916, 922-24 (9th Cir.2005). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Curtis Yarbrough appeals from the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release after a guilty-plea conviction for three counts of bank robbery *682 and two counts of attempted bank robbery, all in violation
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Curtis Yarbrough appeals from the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release after a guilty-plea conviction for three counts of bank robbery *682 and two counts of attempted bank robbery, all in violation
02Yarbrough contends that the district comet’s imposition of a condition of supervised release that requires him to pay all or part of the costs of his drug and psychiatric treatment is an improper delegation of the court’s exclusive authorit
03This contention is foreclosed by our holding in United States v.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Curtis Yarbrough appeals from the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release after a guilty-plea conviction for three counts of bank robbery *682 and two counts of attempted bank robbery, all in violation
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Yarbrough in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622219 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.