FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9421825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Yan Fu

No. 9421825 · Decided August 22, 2023
No. 9421825 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 22, 2023
Citation
No. 9421825
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-50032 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00621-AB-4 v. MEMORANDUM* YAN FU, AKA Sharon, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 15, 2023** Before: TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Yan Fu appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty- plea conviction, 20-month sentence, and restitution order for conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), (h). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fu’s counsel has filed a brief stating * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fu the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Fu waived her right to appeal her conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that her plea was involuntary. She also waived the right to appeal her sentence, with the exception of the court’s restitution order and certain nonstandard supervised release conditions. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Fu’s plea, the restitution order, and all of the exempted supervised release conditions. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 23-50032
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Yan Fu in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 22, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9421825 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →