Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622036
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Woodall
No. 8622036 · Decided June 16, 2006
No. 8622036·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 2006
Citation
No. 8622036
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Shawn James Woodall appeals pro se from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, sentencing him to 18 months imprisonment, and denying his motion to dismiss. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a defendant lacks standing to challenge a completed sentence); see also Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 , 118 S.Ct. 978 , 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (holding that revocation of parole does not create collateral consequences sufficient to extend standing beyond expiration of sentence and rejecting as moot a challenge to an allegedly erroneous parole revocation). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Shawn James Woodall appeals pro se from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, sentencing him to 18 months imprisonment, and denying his motion to dismiss.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Shawn James Woodall appeals pro se from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, sentencing him to 18 months imprisonment, and denying his motion to dismiss.
02Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a defendant lacks standing to challenge a completed sentence); see also Spencer v.
03978 , 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (holding that revocation of parole does not create collateral consequences sufficient to extend standing beyond expiration of sentence and rejecting as moot a challenge to an allegedly erroneous parole revocation
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Shawn James Woodall appeals pro se from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, sentencing him to 18 months imprisonment, and denying his motion to dismiss.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Woodall in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622036 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.