Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8643024
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Webb
No. 8643024 · Decided August 31, 2007
No. 8643024·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 31, 2007
Citation
No. 8643024
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Gale Lawrence Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions, and the district court’s order finding that Webb had not purged his contempt. *401 Webb contends that the district court’s imposition of civil contempt sanctions was improper because the district court lacked jurisdiction, and the district court sought to coerce him to comply with an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summons in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The government moves to dismiss the appeal as moot. Because the district court has ordered Webb released from custody and dismissed the government’s petition to enforce the IRS summons, we conclude that this appeal is moot. See Munoz v. Rowland, 104 F.3d 1096, 1097-98 (9th Cir.1997); Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1064-65 (9th Cir.2007). We reject Webb’s contention that the underlying dispute is capable of repetition yet evading review. See TJnabom Trial Media Coalition v. United States Dist. Court, 183 F.3d 949 , 950-53 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Gale Lawrence Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Gale Lawrence Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
02§ 2241 petition, the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions, and the district court’s order finding that Webb had not purged his contempt.
03*401 Webb contends that the district court’s imposition of civil contempt sanctions was improper because the district court lacked jurisdiction, and the district court sought to coerce him to comply with an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)
04Because the district court has ordered Webb released from custody and dismissed the government’s petition to enforce the IRS summons, we conclude that this appeal is moot.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Gale Lawrence Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Webb in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 31, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8643024 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.