FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642260
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Warren

No. 8642260 · Decided July 19, 2007
No. 8642260 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 19, 2007
Citation
No. 8642260
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Isabel Linda Warren appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sen *437 tenee imposed for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Warren has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Warren did not file a pro se supplemental brief. The government filed notice that it would not be filing an answering brief. Our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *437 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Isabel Linda Warren appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sen *437 tenee imposed for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Isabel Linda Warren appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sen *437 tenee imposed for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Warren in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 19, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642260 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →