Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624537
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Villanueva-Escobar
No. 8624537 · Decided August 25, 2006
No. 8624537·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 25, 2006
Citation
No. 8624537
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Elmer Villanueva-Escobar appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Villanueva-Escobar contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) based on a prior conviction that was not proved to a jury. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006). Moreover, Villanueva-Escobar has conceded that the indictment alleged, and that he so admitted during the plea colloquy, that he had been convicted on July 20, 1994 and subsequently deported on October 2, 1997 and August 3, 2000. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Elmer Villanueva-Escobar appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Elmer Villanueva-Escobar appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Villanueva-Escobar contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C.
03§ 1326 (a) based on a prior conviction that was not proved to a jury.
04Moreover, Villanueva-Escobar has conceded that the indictment alleged, and that he so admitted during the plea colloquy, that he had been convicted on July 20, 1994 and subsequently deported on October 2, 1997 and August 3, 2000.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Elmer Villanueva-Escobar appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Villanueva-Escobar in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 25, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624537 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.