Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625393
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Villagomez-Castillo
No. 8625393 · Decided October 23, 2006
No. 8625393·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 23, 2006
Citation
No. 8625393
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Villagomez-Castillo appeals from his 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 846 and 841(a)(1). Villagomez-Castillo contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to grant his motion to substitute counsel. We dismiss Villagomez-Castillo’s appeal because his valid guilty plea waived the right to appeal antecedent defects. See United States v. Foreman, 329 F.3d 1037, 1038 (9th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing). Moreover, during his change of plea hearing, Villagomez-Castillo expressed satisfaction with counsel that he previously sought to replace. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Villagomez-Castillo appeals from his 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Villagomez-Castillo appeals from his 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
02Villagomez-Castillo contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to grant his motion to substitute counsel.
03We dismiss Villagomez-Castillo’s appeal because his valid guilty plea waived the right to appeal antecedent defects.
04Foreman, 329 F.3d 1037, 1038 (9th Cir.2003); see also United States v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Villagomez-Castillo appeals from his 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Villagomez-Castillo in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 23, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625393 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.