Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644286
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Vance
No. 8644286 · Decided October 1, 2007
No. 8644286·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 1, 2007
Citation
No. 8644286
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Stanley Lee Vance appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month suspended prison term and a 48-month term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Vance challenges the district court’s admission of a hearsay report at the revocation hearing without allowing him to cross-examine its author. Although defendants have a limited right to confront adverse witnesses prior to revocation of supervised release, see Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); see also Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(b)(2), the district court’s use of the report, if error, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the witness whose statement was being offered actually testified, see United States v. Comito, 177 F.3d 1166, 1170 (9th Cir.1999). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Stanley Lee Vance appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month suspended prison term and a 48-month term of supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Stanley Lee Vance appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month suspended prison term and a 48-month term of supervised release.
02Vance challenges the district court’s admission of a hearsay report at the revocation hearing without allowing him to cross-examine its author.
03Although defendants have a limited right to confront adverse witnesses prior to revocation of supervised release, see Morrissey v.
0432.1(b)(2), the district court’s use of the report, if error, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the witness whose statement was being offered actually testified, see United States v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Stanley Lee Vance appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month suspended prison term and a 48-month term of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Vance in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 1, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644286 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.