Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644299
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Van Patten
No. 8644299 · Decided October 2, 2007
No. 8644299·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 2, 2007
Citation
No. 8644299
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Lisa Van Patten appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for plain error, United States v. Ortiz, 362 F.3d 1274, 1278 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm. *676 Appellant contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3624 (e) prohibits the district court from imposing a consecutive sentence of imprisonment where a defendant violates concurrent terms of supervised release. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Jackson, 176 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Lisa Van Patten appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Lisa Van Patten appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release.
02§ 3624 (e) prohibits the district court from imposing a consecutive sentence of imprisonment where a defendant violates concurrent terms of supervised release.