Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626649
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Valdez-Ramirez
No. 8626649 · Decided December 8, 2006
No. 8626649·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 8, 2006
Citation
No. 8626649
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Valdez-Ramirez contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights *598 by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. Valdez-Ramirez concedes, and we agree, that this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Valdez-Ramirez contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights *598 by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C.
03§ 1326 (a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy.
04Valdez-Ramirez concedes, and we agree, that this contention is foreclosed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Valdez-Ramirez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 8, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626649 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.