FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8694559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. United States District Court

No. 8694559 · Decided June 29, 2015
No. 8694559 · Ninth Circuit · 2015 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 29, 2015
Citation
No. 8694559
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v. U.S. District Court, No. 14-70486, 791 F.3d 945 , 2015 WL 3938190 (9th Cir.2015). This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. United States District Court in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 29, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8694559 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →