Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7215213
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Trigueros-Flores
No. 7215213 · Decided March 19, 2002
No. 7215213·Ninth Circuit · 2002·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 19, 2002
Citation
No. 7215213
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Mario Trigueros-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Trigueros-Flores contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when it enhanced his sentence based upon a prior conviction that was neither pleaded in the indictment nor admitted at the plea hearing. In support of this contention, Trigueros-Flores argues that Apprendi overruled Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Trigueros-Flores concedes that his arguments, which he raises in order to preserve them for Supreme Court review, are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000) (as amended). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Mario Trigueros-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Mario Trigueros-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
022348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when it enhanced his sentence based upon a prior conviction that was neither pleaded in the indictment nor admitted at the plea hearing.
03In support of this contention, Trigueros-Flores argues that Apprendi overruled Almendarez-Torres v.
04Trigueros-Flores concedes that his arguments, which he raises in order to preserve them for Supreme Court review, are foreclosed by United States v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Mario Trigueros-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Trigueros-Flores in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 19, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7215213 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.