Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624819
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Storms
No. 8624819 · Decided September 14, 2006
No. 8624819·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 14, 2006
Citation
No. 8624819
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*488 MEMORANDUM ** Robert MacKellar Storms appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Storms contends that he is entitled to relief because of fraudulent conduct by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms which he could not have discovered until he was released from prison. We conclude that the district court did not err in finding that Storms is not entitled to coram nobis relief. See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 760 (9th Cir.2002). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*488 MEMORANDUM ** Robert MacKellar Storms appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis.
Key Points
01*488 MEMORANDUM ** Robert MacKellar Storms appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis.
02Storms contends that he is entitled to relief because of fraudulent conduct by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms which he could not have discovered until he was released from prison.
03We conclude that the district court did not err in finding that Storms is not entitled to coram nobis relief.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
*488 MEMORANDUM ** Robert MacKellar Storms appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Storms in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 14, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624819 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.