United States v. Silkey-Reeves

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6131 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:20-cr-01994-SHR-MAA-1 v. MEMORANDUM* BRIAN KEITH SILKEY-REEVES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Scott H. Rash, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 17, 2025** Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Brian Keith Silkey-Reeves appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the district court’s revocation of supervised release. Silkey-Reeves’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. AFFIRMED. 2 24-6131