Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Sealed I
No. 8645381 · Decided November 21, 2007
No. 8645381·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8645381
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his sentence of time served following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and no answering brief has been filed. We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his sentence of time served following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his sentence of time served following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and no answering brief has been filed.
04We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his sentence of time served following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Sealed I in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 21, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645381 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.