FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623024
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Schmitt

No. 8623024 · Decided July 24, 2006
No. 8623024 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 24, 2006
Citation
No. 8623024
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. *583 We reject Schmitt’s contention that the supervised release statute violates the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. ^006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Schmitt in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 24, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623024 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →