Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8691303
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Sanchez-Birruetta
No. 8691303 · Decided November 6, 2008
No. 8691303·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 6, 2008
Citation
No. 8691303
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Sanchez-Birruetta appeals from the 94-month sentence imposed, upon remand, following his jury-trial conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. *737 Sanchez-Birruetta contends that the district court erroneously applied the Guidelines range as a presumptive sentence, improperly placed the burden on him to prove why a different sentence should be imposed, and misapplied the 18 U.S.C. § 3558 (a) factors. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err, and that the sentence imposed is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 996 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Zavala v. United States, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2491 , 171 L.Ed.2d 780 (2008). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Sanchez-Birruetta appeals from the 94-month sentence imposed, upon remand, following his jury-trial conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Sanchez-Birruetta appeals from the 94-month sentence imposed, upon remand, following his jury-trial conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02*737 Sanchez-Birruetta contends that the district court erroneously applied the Guidelines range as a presumptive sentence, improperly placed the burden on him to prove why a different sentence should be imposed, and misapplied the 18 U.S.C
03We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err, and that the sentence imposed is not substantively unreasonable.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Sanchez-Birruetta appeals from the 94-month sentence imposed, upon remand, following his jury-trial conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Sanchez-Birruetta in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 6, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8691303 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.