Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8643825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Samarah
No. 8643825 · Decided August 22, 2007
No. 8643825·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 22, 2007
Citation
No. 8643825
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*449 MEMORANDUM ** Husam Samarah appeals pro se from the district court’s order for immediate payment of funds to Bank of America (“Bank”), one of the victims of Samarah’s bank fraud offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Samarah challenges the Bank’s participation in obtaining the district court’s order for payment of proceeds to the Bank from a property sale, to be credited towards the amount of restitution ordered when Samarah was convicted of bank fraud. We are unpersuaded, because the proceedings to obtain this payment were conducted in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3664 . We deny Samarah’s motion for extension of time to file a reply brief. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*449 MEMORANDUM ** Husam Samarah appeals pro se from the district court’s order for immediate payment of funds to Bank of America (“Bank”), one of the victims of Samarah’s bank fraud offense.
Key Points
01*449 MEMORANDUM ** Husam Samarah appeals pro se from the district court’s order for immediate payment of funds to Bank of America (“Bank”), one of the victims of Samarah’s bank fraud offense.
02Samarah challenges the Bank’s participation in obtaining the district court’s order for payment of proceeds to the Bank from a property sale, to be credited towards the amount of restitution ordered when Samarah was convicted of bank fraud.
03We are unpersuaded, because the proceedings to obtain this payment were conducted in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
04We deny Samarah’s motion for extension of time to file a reply brief.
Frequently Asked Questions
*449 MEMORANDUM ** Husam Samarah appeals pro se from the district court’s order for immediate payment of funds to Bank of America (“Bank”), one of the victims of Samarah’s bank fraud offense.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Samarah in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 22, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8643825 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.