Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8507856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ruiz-Campos
No. 8507856 · Decided June 22, 2010
No. 8507856·Ninth Circuit · 2010·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 22, 2010
Citation
No. 8507856
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ruiz-Campos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ruiz-Campos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ruiz-Campos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ruiz-Campos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ruiz-Campos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ruiz-Campos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ruiz-Campos in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 22, 2010.
Use the citation No. 8507856 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.