Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697231
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ruiz
No. 8697231 · Decided September 19, 2016
No. 8697231·Ninth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 19, 2016
Citation
No. 8697231
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Thomas Romero Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial convictions and 56-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ruiz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ruiz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Thomas Romero Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial convictions and 56-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Thomas Romero Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial convictions and 56-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ruiz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided Ruiz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Thomas Romero Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial convictions and 56-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ruiz in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 19, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697231 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.