United States v. Rodriguez-Carrillo

MEMORANDUM ** Sebastian Rodriguez-Carrillo appeals from his 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. *653 Rodriguez-Carrillo contends that the district court disregarded the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-599 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Rodriguez-Carrillo also contends that his sentence is unreasonable in that it is greater than necessary to accomplish the sentencing goals set forth under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). We conclude that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable in light of the factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). See id. at 600-602 ; see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994-96 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.