Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623609
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Rocha
No. 8623609 · Decided July 28, 2006
No. 8623609·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 28, 2006
Citation
No. 8623609
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo A. Rocha appeals from the district court’s order, after remand, explaining that it would impose the same sentence under the advisory Guidelines. Rocha was originally sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment following his conviction of three counts of subscribing to false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rocha has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Rocha has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s order. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Rocha appeals from the district court’s order, after remand, explaining that it would impose the same sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
Key Points
01Rocha appeals from the district court’s order, after remand, explaining that it would impose the same sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
02Rocha was originally sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment following his conviction of three counts of subscribing to false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C.
031396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rocha has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
04346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Frequently Asked Questions
Rocha appeals from the district court’s order, after remand, explaining that it would impose the same sentence under the advisory Guidelines.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Rocha in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 28, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623609 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.