Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8687802
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Robinson
No. 8687802 · Decided July 3, 2008
No. 8687802·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 3, 2008
Citation
No. 8687802
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francis Gurdon Robinson appeals from his conviction following a guilty plea to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Robinson contends that the district court abused its discretion by (1) preclud *485 ing him from offering expert testimony from a neurologist; and (2) denying a motion in limine seeking to prevent the government from impeaching him on cross-examination with his prior convictions. Based on the record before us, we conclude that Robinson entered into an intelligent and knowing unconditional plea of guilty, and therefore failed to preserve for appellate review the district court’s adverse pretrial rulings on these matters. See United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 954 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francis Gurdon Robinson appeals from his conviction following a guilty plea to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francis Gurdon Robinson appeals from his conviction following a guilty plea to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
02Robinson contends that the district court abused its discretion by (1) preclud *485 ing him from offering expert testimony from a neurologist; and (2) denying a motion in limine seeking to prevent the government from impeaching him on cross
03Based on the record before us, we conclude that Robinson entered into an intelligent and knowing unconditional plea of guilty, and therefore failed to preserve for appellate review the district court’s adverse pretrial rulings on these matt
04Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 954 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francis Gurdon Robinson appeals from his conviction following a guilty plea to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Robinson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 3, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8687802 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.