Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8902598
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Rivera
No. 8902598 · Decided September 7, 1972
No. 8902598·Ninth Circuit · 1972·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 7, 1972
Citation
No. 8902598
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence. Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.
Plain English Summary
Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.
Key Points
01Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.
02Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Rivera in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 7, 1972.
Use the citation No. 8902598 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.