Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688173
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Rempel
No. 8688173 · Decided July 31, 2008
No. 8688173·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2008
Citation
No. 8688173
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Wall Rempel appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Rempel contends that his sentence is unreasonably harsh because he was merely attempting to retrieve his children. We conclude that Rempel’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-96 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Wall Rempel appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Wall Rempel appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Rempel contends that his sentence is unreasonably harsh because he was merely attempting to retrieve his children.
03We conclude that Rempel’s sentence is substantively reasonable.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Wall Rempel appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Rempel in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688173 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.